The headline of last week’s column was “Where do you draw the line?” and this week’s article could very well have been called the same thing. It deals with those gray areas where lines are drawn and how those lines seem suspect when a broader perspective is added to the equation. It sounds confusing but you’ll see what I’m talking about.
Knowing where to draw the line — somewhere between two ill-defined areas — usually comes down to a matter of priorities … more or less. And priorities are as subjective as opinions. And let’s face it, opinions are the fruits of our prejudices.
Now before I get started, let it be known that I am merely pointing things out. I’m not taking sides on thorny issues because that will create a log-jam of “you heartless, jerk” e-mails. In other words: Don’t shoot the messenger! I am here as your loyal scribe willing to condone nothing irrational … unless, of course, a fee is involved.
In early June of this year, the demolition of the Lockport Mall was halted because of seagulls. Seagulls: You may know them better as naval pigeons. They decided to take up residency in the abandoned parking lot. Immediately, some folks deemed the birds were in danger. They worried that unnecessary “stress” caused by the workers was bothering these avian homesteaders. (Please hold your laughter.)
So let’s cut to the chase: Bird stress takes precedent over the time and money that people have invested into a project. Did the protesters not think there was stress with those involved in this operation? Did they not think that the stress was compounded by shutting down the operation? Does human stress play second fiddle to that of an invasive bird?
We go out of our way to alleviate mental anguish for seagulls but butcher chickens for chicken-wing eating contests! We make a sport out of blasting graceful ducks into mincemeat in mid-flight — but we can’t interrupt an intrusive water bird? What if they were rats? Would people come to their rescue?